Welcome to the ‘Chitter-Chatter‘ series. I’m so glad you are here. ❤
In case you have missed previous posts in this series, we are still talking about:
- To-Be-Read lists and how to manage them
- Reading Challenges and how to feel comfortable at failing them
- How to feel better during Reading Slumps
- How our values may explain why we enjoy blogging
- And How to feel better whilst setting our reading / blogging goals
In today’s post, I would like us to talk about book ratings.
Or rather for them to be, or not to be: that is the question. 😊
I have been recently wondering how comparable these ratings are across different genres as well as how granular they really are. I mean if I incline towards 4 stars, but it’s not quite there, but then 3 ½ stars seem a bit low… I know, I am overthinking it.
How do you rate a coffee table book vs. a fantasy book? One will show you lovely images and could make your living space more enjoyable whereas the other one may get your heart pumping and could get you emotionally invested. Is it fair to rate the first lower than the latter because of perhaps a lack of emotional investment? I guess if you, as a book blogger, tend to stick to one genre, maybe this question becomes redundant. But I like to read a lot of non-fiction as well as fiction. And I’m starting to wonder if my non-fiction ratings are directly comparable to my fiction ratings…
What also bugs me the most is when my heart is in a conflict with my brain. That’s where I have not idea how to rate.
I’ll give you an example:
I finished reading The Great Alone by Kristin Hannah. I was fully emotionally invested, I cried a lot and my heart loved it. I gave it 5 stars on GoodReads straight after I finished it. Then I started thinking about it. And my dear brain told me: ‘ehm, the ending was rushed, it was a bit of a soap opera really, there were quite a few clichés… let’s give it 3 or 3 ½ if we are generous, shall we’? My heart is refusing to listen and wants to firmly stick to the 5-star rating.
So which rating shall I give it? Shall I average them? Or listen to my brain?
Ultimately all reviews are our opinions and are therefore subjective. I think describing our reasons for liking a certain book and then pointing out where it personally fell a bit short of us, seems quite fair to me.
We are reading Art. Is it fair to rate the work of art?
I honestly don’t know the answer to it yet.
But I am starting to incline towards writing a review which will leave a reader with my thoughts rather that with thoughts + a number.
I’m not saying we shouldn’t use ratings by the way, I’m just thinking out loud and trying to work out what would work the best for me.
If you enjoy giving your books ratings, please don’t feel judged. That’s not my intention at all. ❤
As I’m trying to figure it all out, I will be very grateful for any of your advice.
I am especially keen to work out if:
- you listen to your heart
- you listen to your brain
- you listen to both of them
If your answer is 3), how do you then reflect that in your overall rating please?
I appreciate all your comments, they always make my day. 😊❤